A foreign court generally does not have to approve a Section 1782 request before an interested person asks a U.S. federal court for discovery. The federal court decides whether the request meets the requirements of Section 1782 and whether to allow the discovery.
DMR Law can review the foreign proceeding and determine whether Section 1782 applies. A Miami civil litigation lawyer from our firm can also identify what documents, testimony, or other evidence may be requested. Section 1782 may apply to civil matters and certain foreign criminal investigations, where additional legal issues may come into play.
The foreign court’s position can still matter even when its approval is not required. A U.S. judge may consider whether that court would be receptive to the requested assistance and whether the application attempts to get around the other country’s rules for gathering evidence.
A Section 1782 Request Does Not Usually Need Prior Approval From the Foreign Court
A person seeking discovery under Section 1782 generally does not have to ask the foreign court for permission first. DMR Law can review the proceeding abroad and determine whether the person seeking evidence may apply directly to a U.S. federal court.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, an application may be made by a foreign tribunal or an “interested person.” A party involved in the foreign proceeding may qualify as an interested person. This means the foreign court does not have to submit the request itself. A person who qualifies under the statute may ask the U.S. federal court for an order allowing discovery.
The U.S. Supreme Court addressed this issue in Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. The Court explained that Section 1782 does not require a foreign proceeding to be pending or imminent before discovery is requested. It also rejected the idea that the evidence must first be discoverable under the law of the foreign country.
A Foreign Court May Request Help Through a Letter Rogatory
A foreign court may also ask a U.S. court for help obtaining evidence. One way to do this is through a letter rogatory, which is a formal request from a court in one country to a court in another country.
Section 1782 allows a federal court to act in response to a letter rogatory or another request from a foreign tribunal. This is one way to seek judicial assistance, but it is not the only way.
An interested person may apply directly to the federal court when the requirements of Section 1782 are met. The absence of a letter rogatory does not by itself prevent someone from seeking discovery.
Contact us for a consultation at (305) 548-8666
The U.S. Federal Court Decides Whether to Grant the Request
The decision to allow Section 1782 discovery belongs to the U.S. federal court where the application is filed. DMR Law can prepare an application that explains why the court has authority to consider the request and how the requested evidence relates to the foreign proceeding.
Section 1782 gives federal district courts the authority to order certain people or businesses to provide testimony, documents, or other evidence for use in a qualifying foreign proceeding.
In general, the applicant must show that the statutory requirements are met. These include:
- The person or business from whom discovery is sought resides or is found in the federal district.
- The discovery is sought for use in a proceeding before a qualifying foreign or international tribunal.
- The application is made by the foreign tribunal or an interested person.
Meeting these requirements allows the federal court to consider whether to grant the requested discovery. It does not mean the judge has to grant everything requested. The statute says a district court may order the discovery. The judge, therefore, has discretion to decide whether allowing it is appropriate.
This distinction matters when there has been no order from the foreign court approving the discovery. The U.S. court can still consider the application and make its own decision under federal law.
The Foreign Court’s Views Can Still Affect the Decision
Foreign court approval is generally not a condition for filing the application, but its position may still affect what happens. DMR Law can review orders, rules, or other information from the foreign proceeding that may help the U.S. court understand how the requested evidence would be received.
In Intel, the U.S. Supreme Court identified several factors that federal judges may consider when deciding whether to allow Section 1782 discovery. One is the foreign court’s receptivity to assistance from a U.S. federal court.
Receptivity Is Different From Approval
The U.S. judge may consider whether the foreign court is open to receiving evidence obtained through Section 1782. The judge may also consider reliable information showing that the foreign tribunal does not want the requested assistance.
The Eleventh Circuit, whose decisions apply to federal courts in Florida, has addressed this issue. In Department of Caldas v. Diageo PLC, the court explained that both sides may offer information concerning the foreign tribunal’s receptivity to U.S. judicial assistance.
This does not create a general rule requiring an applicant to obtain permission from the foreign judge before filing a Section 1782 application. The foreign tribunal’s views may help the judge decide whether to allow the requested discovery, but those views are not the same as required approval.
Click to contact our lawyers today
Federal Courts Consider Other Factors Before Allowing Discovery
The foreign court’s receptivity is only part of the federal judge’s review. DMR Law can examine the full request for issues that may affect whether the court allows the discovery or limits its scope.
One consideration is whether the person or business holding the evidence is already part of the foreign proceeding. If that person is outside the foreign court’s reach, there may be a stronger reason for a U.S. court to assist with discovery.
The Court May Review the Purpose and Scope of the Request
A judge may also look at whether the application appears to be an attempt to get around the foreign country’s proof-gathering restrictions or other policies. The fact that another country uses different discovery procedures does not automatically prevent a Section 1782 request.
The court looks more closely at whether the applicant is trying to avoid an actual restriction. The scope of the request matters as well. A judge may reject or narrow discovery that is too broad or would place an unreasonable burden on the person or business receiving the request.
These factors give the federal judge room to consider the circumstances of each application. They also explain why foreign court approval is not the only issue that matters when seeking discovery under Section 1782.
Complete a Case Evaluation form now
Talk to DMR Law About Foreign Court Approval and a Section 1782 Request
A Section 1782 request generally does not require foreign court approval before an interested person applies to a U.S. federal court. The foreign tribunal’s position can still become part of the federal judge’s review, along with the purpose and scope of the requested discovery.
DMR Law brings more than 60 years of combined experience to complex state and federal matters and serves clients in Florida and Puerto Rico. Attorney Maria A. Dominguez-Victoriano is a former federal prosecutor who has handled complex, high-profile cases. Her background gives us insight into issues that may arise during a Section 1782 matter.
DMR Law works as a team, and it is part of our commitment to provide a human touch with outstanding results. If you are considering a Section 1782 application or need to respond to one, DMR Law can determine what steps may be available. Contact us today for a private consultation.
Call or text (305) 548-8666 or complete a Case Evaluation form